Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDharmakeerthi, R. S.
dc.contributor.authorKumaragamage, D.
dc.contributor.authorGoltz, D.
dc.contributor.authorIndraratne, S. P.
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-22T08:22:11Z
dc.date.available2020-10-22T08:22:11Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-30
dc.identifier.citationDharmakeerthi, R. S., D. Kumaragamage, D. Goltz, and S. P. Indraratne. “Phosphorus Release from Unamended and Gypsum- or Biochar-Amended Soils under Simulated Snowmelt and Summer Flooding Conditions.” Journal of Environmental Quality 48(4) (July 2019):822–830. DOI: 10.2134/jeq2019.02.0091.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10680/1848
dc.description.abstractProlonged flooding changes the oxidation–reduction status of soils, often enhancing P release to overlying floodwater. We studied P release from unamended, gypsum-amended, and biochar-amended soils under simulated snowmelt flooding (previously frozen, cold flooding at +4°C) and summer flooding (unfrozen, warm flooding at +22°C) using two soils, Fyala clay (FYL-Cl) and Neuenberg sandy loam (NBG-SL), from Manitoba, Canada. Amended and unamended soils were packed into vessels and flooded under cold and warm temperatures in the laboratory. Pore water and floodwater samples were taken weekly for 6 wk after flooding (WAF) and thereafter biweekly for 10 WAF and analyzed for dissolved reactive P (DRP), pH, and cation concentrations. The NBG-SL showed a significantly higher DRP concentration in pore water and floodwater despite its low Olsen P content. Redox potential (Eh) decreased slowly under cold versus warm flooding; hence, redox-induced P release was substantially lower under cold flooding. Gypsum amendment significantly decreased the floodwater DRP concentrations in NBG-SL by 38 and 35% under cold and warm flooding, respectively, but had no significant effect in FYL-Cl, which had low DRP concentrations (<1.2 mg L−1) throughout the flooding period. Biochar amendment significantly increased floodwater DRP concentrations by 27 to 68% in FYL-Cl under cold and warm flooding, respectively, but had no significant effect in NBG-SL. The results indicate substantially less P release under cold than under warm flooding. Gypsum was effective in reducing floodwater DRP concentrations only at high DRP concentrations; thus, the effectiveness was greater under warm than under cold flooding conditions.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship"Funding for this research was provided by a National Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grant and a University of Winnipeg Major Grant to Darshani Kumaragamage, and a fellowship awarded by the University of Winnipeg–Queen Elizabeth Advanced Scholar Program to R.S. Dharmakeerthi."en_US
dc.description.urihttps://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2134/jeq2019.02.0091
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of Americaen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPhosphorus -- Environmental aspectsen_US
dc.titlePhosphorus Release from Unamended and Gypsum- or Biochar-Amended Soils under Simulated Snowmelt and Summer Flooding Conditionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2134/jeq2019.02.0091en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record